Question
Answered step-by-step
Asked by MinisterFinchPerson324
IN REGARDS TO REFRENCES BELOW I WROTE THIS OUT BUT NEED WRITING ADVISE TO SHORTEN FOR SENTENCE FOR Â CRITICAL APPRAISAL?
Â
Aein, F., & Aliakbari, F. (2017). Identified that In contrast to the standard linear nursing report sheet, a concept mapping experiment was conducted, and the results showed significant increases in critical thinking abilities; nevertheless, the effects were only short-term, thus more longitudinal research is advised.
Banjo-Ogunnowo, S., & Chisholm, L. (2022). The purpose of this study was to create a Likert-type scale to assess the usefulness of the concept map. It has been demonstrated that concept mapping education enhances concept mapping skills and motivation for critical thinking abilities but does not assist develop critical thinking and critical judgment skills. Only serves to inspire individuals to complete the concept mapping task, and no measuring techniques for assessing concept maps have been discovered. The purpose of this study was to create a Likert-type scale to assess the usefulness of the concept map.
Letcher, D., Roth, S., & Varenhorst, L. (2017). This article focuses on the results of clinical situations where nursing expertise and clinical judgment are used. The Tanner Model is intended to motivate trainees to consider their own abilities as well as the responses of patients. The Tanner model assists students in developing the clinical reasoning skills necessary for practice and licensing in conjunction with the nursing process. For trainees to arrive at a reliable clinical judgment conclusion, Tanner’s method offers four clinical reasoning processes (how a nurse thinks).
Yue, M. (2017). Completed a systematic literature evaluation on concept mapping, which could (but has not been demonstrated) affect critical thinking affective dispositions and cognitive skills. Since critical thinking is a long-term process integrating training, practice, and therapeutic work, there are various tools for assessing it. Additional research may be restricted by the limitations of these instruments used to evaluate critical thinking. The systematic review summarized thirteen studies, while the meta-analysis included eleven trials.
SCIENCE
HEALTH SCIENCE
NURSING
MSN – FNP 26
